knitboots

Barney Hosleyns In Taylor's universe, music *#tlzqm12 papers become merely another adjunct or extension of promotion. If that really were the case, however, why would people read about music at all? Surely not just to discover what aftershave Simon Le Bon is wearing? As far as good pop writers and readers are concerned, there are people working in music who are doing interesting things, making significant meaning of it. They are using and, if necessary question- ing it: making a meta-music, a music about music. This is what Simon Frith called sky blue air jordans the 'punk vanguard', a line which could be stretched to include musics as different as the Gang of Four's, the Fall's, the Raincoats', and Einsturzende Neubauten's. To those who write about this music, about 'difficult' groups, about jazz, music is quite as 'important' as it is important for Duran Duran to receive the royalties for Rio. Bohn's Germans and Cook's jazz avant-ists are people who simply are not compet- ing in Taylor's universe of pure consumption. They are not writing'hits'. pink jordan 23 fusions What is really insidious about the position of people like Taylor is its implicit anti-pluralism. Taylor himself has already polarized his one-dimensional universe between Wham! (presumably as honest market-force 'pop') and the Redskins (presumably as 'rock' becomes self-important again). And this is surely as narrow as the reverse view, which would, in Levi-Straussian terms, see the Redskins as 'raw', untreated, a voice of truth, and Wham! as'cooked', synthetic, false. (Before one even begins to dissect these views, jordan shoes 9 both 'Young Guns' and 'Lean On Me' were great records.) The point is that NME no more needs to be seen backing a specific 'party' than whosale jordan shoes Smasb Hits does. It is a place for the discus- sion of the myriad details and intersections that comprise a state (always dynamic) of subculture. It is in turn 'telling' that Taylor quotes the bemusement of America's music press at the 'power' of our rags, when it was Jann Wenner, who at the inception of Rolling Stone in 1968 described it as 'sort of a magazine and sort of a newspaper' which would be 'not just